Current:Home > MarketsUNESCO is criticized after Cambodia evicts thousands around World Heritage site Angkor Wat -Elevate Profit Vision
UNESCO is criticized after Cambodia evicts thousands around World Heritage site Angkor Wat
View
Date:2025-04-15 22:17:32
BANGKOK (AP) — The human rights group Amnesty International has strongly criticized UNESCO and its World Heritage program for failing to challenge the Cambodian government’s ongoing mass evictions at the famous centuries-old Angkor Wat temple complex.
The London-based organization in a report released Tuesday charged that the evictions of an estimated 10,000 families by Cambodian authorities violated international and national law.
It said the evicted people have received little or no compensation and the government’s two main resettlement sites have inadequate facilities in terms of roads, water and electricity supplies and sanitation.
The report accused UNESCO of disregarding U.N. guidelines in failing in its obligation to intervene and promote the human right to housing. UNESCO should take a stand especially because its designation of Angkor Wat as a World Heritage site needing protection from damage was reportedly used by Cambodia’s government as an excuse for moving people away from it, said Amnesty.
In response to the findings, the report said that UNESCO World Heritage Center wrote that it “does not have the ability to enforce implementation of rights-based standards and policy recommendations as our role is rather focused on policy advice, capacity building and advocacy.”
There are more than 1,200 World Heritage sites worldwide. Angkor Wat was granted that status in 1992, in part because of fears that the growth of human settlements on the site posed a possible threat to its preservation.
However, the designation was not clear regarding existing settlements, which until last year were left basically undisturbed, said the report. Cambodia is now keen to develop the area for tourism, which lapsed during the coronavirus pandemic.
“Cambodian authorities cruelly uprooted families who have lived in Angkor for several generations, forcing them to live hand to mouth at ill-prepared relocation sites. They must immediately cease forcibly evicting people and violating international human rights law,” said Montse Ferrer, interim deputy regional director for research at Amnesty.
The report says Cambodian authorities claim that the villagers are moving out of the site voluntarily, but that Amnesty’s research earlier this year, including interviews with more than 100 people, established that “almost all ... described being evicted or pressured to leave Angkor following intimidation, harassment, threats and acts of violence from Cambodian authorities.”
“Nobody wants to leave their home,” it quoted one woman who had lived at Angkor for more than 70 years as saying.
In addition to inadequate facilities provided at the resettlement camps, their locations -- almost an hour by motorbike from Angkor — also make it hard to make a living. Many had earned an income by supplying goods and services for the busy tourist trade at Angkor Wat. Those who engaged in farming says their new location has not been prepared for the activity.
“Cambodia is obligated under seven major human rights treaties to respect, protect and fulfill the right to adequate housing,” the report said.
It said Cambodian officials have dismissed Amnesty’s research and inaccurately accused it of reaching conclusions “thousands of kilometers away from the real situation.” Amnesty said at least 15 of the families it interviewed said the government told them they had to move in order to preserve Angkor’s World Heritage status.
It quoted a speech that then-Prime Minister Hun Sen gave last year saying the site risked losing the designation unless they moved away, and those who did not do so voluntarily would get no compensation. Under his authoritarian rule, such remarks were tantamount to official policy.
veryGood! (8149)
Related
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- US Postal Service plans to downsize a mail hub in Nevada. What does that mean for mail-in ballots?
- Iran holds first parliamentary election since 2022 mass protests, amid calls for boycott
- First over-the-counter birth control pill coming to U.S. stores
- 'Most Whopper
- Brit Turner of the country rock band Blackberry Smoke dies at 57 after brain tumor diagnosis
- Eagles center Jason Kelce retires after 13 NFL seasons and 1 Super Bowl ring
- Noah Cyrus Frees the Nipple During Paris Fashion Week Outing With Fiancé Pinkus
- Brianna LaPaglia Reveals The Meaning Behind Her "Chickenfry" Nickname
- Curfews, checkpoints, mounted patrols: Miami, Florida cities brace for spring break 2024
Ranking
- The 401(k) millionaires club keeps growing. We'll tell you how to join.
- Jack Teixeira pleads guilty to leaking hundreds of highly classified Pentagon documents
- Florida gymnastics coach charged with having sex with 2 underage students
- How does 'the least affordable housing market in recent memory' look in your area? Check our map
- Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
- US Postal Service plans to downsize a mail hub in Nevada. What does that mean for mail-in ballots?
- FAA audit faults Boeing for 'multiple instances' of quality control shortcomings
- Rescue of truck driver dangling from bridge was a team effort, firefighter says
Recommendation
How to watch the 'Blue Bloods' Season 14 finale: Final episode premiere date, cast
Quick! Swimsuits for All Is Having a Sale for Today Only, Score Up to 50% off Newly Stocked Bestsellers
Joshua Jackson and Lupita Nyong'o Confirm Romance With PDA-Filled Tropical Getaway
What is Super Tuesday and how does tomorrow's voting work?
San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
One Tech Tip: Change these settings on X to limit calls and hide your IP address
'American Idol' contestant tearfully sings in Albanian after judges FaceTime his mom
Trillions of gallons leak from aging drinking water systems, further stressing shrinking US cities